Critical Confabulations

a theatre, film & pop culture review

Archive for the ‘Cinematography’ Category

Oscars 2012: Best Cinematography

Posted by Julie on February 13, 2012

Note: This is my personal ranking, listed in order from best to worst, with #1 being my favorite. Prediction for the actual winner is in orange.

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY

1. THE TREE OF LIFE

2. THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO

3. THE ARTIST

4. HUGO

5. WAR HORSE

French cinematographer Guillaume Schiffman is director Michel Hazanavicius’s frequent collaborator. But if you’d never heard of him before this year’s Oscars, it wouldn’t be that surprising as he’s worked primarily in French film and this marks his first Academy Award nomination. Many are predicting a win here, probably because of The Artist‘s likely sweep of this year’s awards, but I have my doubts; two other contenders are much stronger.

DP Jeff Cronenwith first worked with David Fincher when he was assisting his father, also a DP, Jordan Cronenweth, on a Madonna music video that Fincher was directing. Apparently cinematography runs in the blood, because Fincher then went on to work with the younger Cronenweth on Fight Club, The Social Network and finally, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. A dark murder mystery, Cronenweth beautifully utilized the oppressive Swedish winter to his and the story’s advantage. Making the über-gloomy season a kind of additional character, the DP was aggressive with contrast and shadows, manipulating soft light and cool color tones to create an atmosphere of desolation and foreboding that perfectly complimented the lonely characters.

The Tree of Life‘s Best Picture nomination may have been surprising, but its nod for cinematography was anything but. For DP Emmanuel Lubezki, it was all about capturing the magic of the moment , of nature, and shooting emotions in multiple perspectives, a technique he also utilized in The New World (also Oscar-nominated), another collaboration with director Terrence Malick. The result is a gorgeous, free-flowing impressionistic think piece that appears to float dreamily across the screen. The film may have its detractors, but Mr. Lubezki does not: his visual appreciation and understanding of small moments is extraordinary, and I would be shocked if he didn’t accept his first Oscar on February 26th.

As for our final two nominees, well, they surely won’t win:

Dealing with the technical issues of shooting in 3D and against green screens, while also emulating the qualities of Autochrome, Robert Richardson (two-time Oscar winner for The Aviator and JFK) gave Hugo an intimate and retro look with predominating browns, blues and yellows.

Frequent Spielberg collaborator, Janusz Kaminski (two-time Oscar winner for Saving Private Ryan and Schindler’s List) went old-school for the WWI flick War Horse, doing all of the colorizations and compositions in camera (does that explain the silly Crayola-colored sky in the film’s final shot?).

Posted in Cinematography, Film, Oscar-Nominated | Tagged: | 1 Comment »

Oscars 2011: Best Cinematography

Posted by Julie on February 13, 2011

Note: This is my personal ranking, listed in order from best to worst, with #1 being my favorite. Prediction for the actual winner is in orange.

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY

1. Black Swan

2. True Grit

3. Inception

4. The Social Network

5. The King’s Speech

Inception has a lot of nifty handheld, 360-degree camera work; The Social Network nicely melds together David Fincher’s dark grittiness with the lush, historical setting of Cambridge, MA; The King’s Speech utilizes lots of wide lenses super-close to the actors’ faces to manipulate a greater emotional connection between the characters and the film’s audience.

But just watch the video below, and you’ll see why True Grit is going to come out on top. The use of light in the courtroom scene alone should win Roger Deakins his first Oscar, and it’s about time too: this makes his ninth nomination following tremendous work on The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, No Country for Old Men, and The Shawshank Redemption, among others. While most agree True Grit is not his best work, the fact that he is one of the most respected in the industry and has not yet won, makes this his year. But honestly, it’s hard to argue with this win — his restraint and eye for stunning camera angles is breathtaking. Who knew a curmudgeonly comical Western could be this beautiful?

As vital and extraordinarily effective as Black Swan‘s cinematography is, first-time nominee Matthew Libatique is not going to go home with a statue, though I wish he would. Going from big-budget glossy comic book flick Iron Man (he was cinematographer for both the first and second films) to the low-budget, lurid thriller Black Swan demonstrates his dedication to creating the best visual atmosphere for whatever project is on-hand. Where Deakins shows restraint and slowly panning vistas, Libatique’s work is shockingly in your face, jolting you into Nina’s claustrophobic paranoia. Keeping everything so dark and monochromatic, all use of color is symbolic; he plays with mirrors and meaning — their light and reflections; and on top of all that, he films the choreography in 360 degrees, a major challenge. While his work may not be the prettiest, it’s not supposed to be. The fact that it’s dark and oppressive is exactly the effect the film required, and Libatique deserves recognition for it.

Posted in Cinematography, Oscar-Nominated | Leave a Comment »

Oscars 2010: Foreign Language, Animated, + Documentary Films

Posted by Julie on March 6, 2010

Note: My personal rankings are listed in order from best to least accomplished, with #1 being my favorite, while predictions for the actual winners appear in orange.

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM

1. The Milk of Sorrow (Peru)

1. A Prophet (France)

3. Ajami (Israel)

4. El Secreto de Sus Ojos (Argentina)

5. The White Ribbon (Germany)

I honestly have no idea what will win this category. If you believe “serious” critical sources like the New York Times or Roger Ebert, the big prize will go to that severe (and severely painful) commentary on fascism, The White Ribbon (I’ve already said once why it shouldn’t win). If you have more faith in your Average Blogger or popular ‘zine (Entertainment Weekly, perhaps?), the decades-spanning crime drama El Secreto de Sus Ojos may very well be the evening’s big spoiler. I’m putting my money on the latter; with its universal themes of love and retribution, it’s as decent a prediction as any despite its penchant for overly-romanticized cinematography and cheesetastic lines like the following: “A guy can change anything: his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion,his God. But there’s one thing he can’t change. He can’t change his passion.” However, it does pack one solid gut-punch of an ending.

But don’t entirely discount A Prophet. Another crime drama, but this one is more The Godfather than The Fugitive with its graphic violence and mafia obsessions. A young Arab (the stunning Tahar Rahim) serves a six-year sentence for a petty crime, and  finds himself ensnared in a dangerous world of warring criminal factions. A gritty and entirely gripping prison drama, this fantastic French film offers some solid competition to the pretentious (The White Ribbon) and the popular (El Secreto de Sus Ojos) choices. And while the ambitious and beautifully acted Ajami convincingly depicts the volatile relationship between Arabs and Jews in Israel across multiple story lines which are expertly woven together (its structure is reminiscent of Slumdog Millionare), the film is over-long and stumbles into some clichés.

The one nominee that’s sure to be overlooked, however, is arguably the year’s most fascinating film – foreign or otherwise. The Milk of Sorrow is beautifully shot: single pearls drop with acute promise into a bowl, daunting dessert staircases spiral upward endlessly, and an old woman in intimate close-up sings emotionlessly about brutalities we’d dare not imagine. Along with these stunning images comes a fierce allegory of Peru’s sexually violent and political history: a timid young woman suffers from “the milk of sorrow,” a psychologically damaging disease causing her to take drastic measures to maintain her personal and emotional safety. Harrowing and gorgeously compelling, The Milk of Sorrow is the year’s finest film that Academy voters never saw.

BEST ANIMATED FEATURE


1. Up

2. Fantastic Mr. Fox

3. The Princess and the Frog

4. Coraline

5. The Secret of Kells


There’s always this moment: when something – a film, a band, a novel – earns raves, the hype consequently builds, and it becomes so extraordinarily popular and beloved by both critics and audiences alike that the backlash is inevitable. All of a sudden something that was so fantastic isn’t nearly so fantastic anymore simply because everyone loves it. Somehow it loses its appeal. Somehow, suddenly, the popular thing is to not like it, and to throw support to the “underdog.”

It’s not very cool to love Up anymore. The trendy thing is to dig the argyle-lovin’ Fantastic Mr. Fox with its hipster soundtrack and clever dialogue (and oh, how I do totally dig it).

Wait, that’s so five minutes ago.

Now it’s really all about the flat, abstract illustration of a young Irish chap as he rebels against his monk-father and befriends a wolf-fairy-girl in – a rather dry – pursuit of the legendary book in The Secret of Kells. And while practically everyone suffers from mommy/daddy issues that will always keep us in deep sympathy with the pale goth-girl Coraline as she battles her creepy button-eyed Other-Mother, Tim Burton dark ‘toon has the added misfortune of arriving on the scene before that CGIed tale of the soaring senior, which immediately took all the wind for its own balloon-sails. And the erratically charming The Princess and the Frog arrived terribly late to the game with its outrageously belated first African American princess, tired Randy Newman ‘tunes, and lazy hand-drawn animation. Clearly Disney didn’t want to steal any of its own thunder.

Despite all the backlash, no one can argue that Up (read my full review here) is a sure bet on Oscar night. All you need to do is rewatch that brilliantly calibrated opening montage of love and loss and you’ll laugh, weep, and then laugh and weep again – all within ten wordless minutes sensitively underscored by Giacchino.  How quickly you’ll forget all about those foxes and frogs, and long to take the journey Up all over again.

BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE

1. The Cove

2. Food, Inc.

3. Which Way Home

4. The Most Dangerous Man in America:
Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers

5. Burma VJ

Note: This is a quick update to my list, as I just watched Which Way Home this afternoon (3/7/10).

It’s been a year of seemingly endless affliction (as these nominees and others would lead you to believe). The freshly filmed and nicely polished-looking Food, Inc., for example, offers us the comforting knowledge – rather redundantly if you’ve read the novel or seen the cinematic adaptation of Fast Food Nation, that this doc is based on – that everything we eat is terrible for us; and it all goes back, way back, to the inhumane treatment of farm animals and the horrible working conditions within our factories. New information? Not exactly. Perfect blend of the personal, the facts, and smooth filmmaking? Definitely.

The other three docs aren’t nearly as refined as Food, Inc. but The Most Dangerous Man in America is definitely more interesting – at least if you’re anything like me and are solely lacking in the knowledge of this highly historical moment. A well-told story of the one super-smart Everyman who smuggled thousands of Pentagon documents and leaked them to the press, uncovering top-secret governmental policies regarding Vietnam, this documentary simultaneously personalizes and historicizes the essential, vital argument for free press and freedom of speech.

The simple act of filming Burma VJ is an incredible and harrowing achievement. Governed by a repressive military regime, the people of Burma are forbidden to film or photograph anything, and the filmmakers literally risked life and limb to smuggle this film to outside sources. After the initial shock wears off of the uber-necessary stealthy filming techniques and the typical daily treatment of citizens (not to mention the jailing of monks), the doc loses power and yet trucks right along, capturing footage after footage of much the same.

Which Way Home is an interesting doc, but one that seems to sympathize with its subjects more than question them. About children migrating illegally over the Mexican-US border, the kids’ courage and ambitions to better their families lives by finding the “American Dream” is both endearing and frustrating, and their parents’ knowledge of the extreme dangers that they are facing in crossing the border  (and allowing them to take the risk anyway) is infuriating.

It’s strange how a film that is so flawed (and for which I had strong remarks for in my full review) ended up topping my list.  The Cove’s largely personal, highly emotional – and to mention thrilling – mission to uncover the needless and horrifically violent yearly dolphin slaughterings in a cove off of Japan, is by far the most mesmerizing and the most effectual. Sure, the facts are skewed for emotional effect, and the film’s main human subject, a Flipper-trainer-turned-activist, is obviously on a mission of self-redemption, but this personal journey actually ups the stakes – for both the subjects and for us. Revealing passion – even passion that is at times misguided – doesn’t discredit the film, but actually heightens its effect: as enraged as I was at some of the factual shortcomings, I was even more so at the acts of violence being perpetuated. If filmmaking inspires movement and change from its audience, then perhaps the other nominees should take a passionate cue from The Cove.

Next up: Best Actor + Actress

Posted in Animated, Cinematography, Foreign Language, Oscar-Nominated, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Oscars 2010: Cinematography + Editing

Posted by Julie on March 2, 2010

How a film is shot and cut creates the mood and feel of a piece, and is  also essential to the effectiveness of the overall story and its development. So let’s explore the merits of some of the year’s best storytellers via the cinematography and film editing categories.

CINEMATOGRAPHY

1. Avatar

2. The White Ribbon

3. Inglourious Basterds

4. The Hurt Locker

5. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

cin·e·ma·tog·ra·phy
n.
The art or technique of movie photography, including both the shooting and development of the film. Involves the composition of a scene, lighting of the set and actors, choice of cameras, camera angle, and integration of special effects to achieve the photographic images desired by the director. Cinematography focuses on relations between the individual shots and groups of shots that make up a scene to produce a film’s effect.

Working from the above definition (whether flawed or not, it covers the core elements of cinematography), I’m not sure anyone could not vote for Avatar. It’s beautifully shot, the special effects are fully integrated and essential to the overall effectiveness of the film, and the fact that on top of all its lush, detailed pictures, it was also crafted (perfectly) for 3-D, places Mauro Fiore’s work high above the competition. Of course, I wouldn’t mind an upset, particularly if it was in favor of the artsy, über-German The White Ribbon. While I detested this film about strange, horrible events that occur in a small German village on the eve of WWI (talk about ritual punishment…), Christian Berger’s use of black and white film makes the story’s bizarre events all the more gruesome and striking. Truth be told, I find all of the nominees worthy of a trophy, not the least of which, Inglourious Basterds, is vibrantly filmed in what one can only describe is the old-school classic Hollywood style.

FILM EDITING


1. The Hurt Locker

2. District 9

3. Avatar

4. Inglourious Basterds

5. Precious

Let’s mix it up a little and award the little-war-movie-that-could instead of the big and bad CGI-fest, shall we?  It’s true that Avatar does have a real shot at this one (especially if it wins many of the other smaller categories), but I think voters will (and should) note how much the suspenseful The Hurt Locker’s success rides on the tightness of its expert editing to create such an enormously tense film. Though its ludicrous to believe District 9 possesses a better chance of winning than Avatar in this category, Julian Clarke’s editing is no less essential to the story it tells : the choppiness of the film, as it veers from media coverage to disturbing views of African slums to chaotic interactions between man and “prawn,” fantastically establishes the atmosphere of chaos and desperation. On a less positive note, Precious’s editing was messy and manipulative, and the film’s creators shouldn’t expect any awards outside of the acting categories.

Next up: Best Original + Adapted Screenplays

Posted in Cinematography, Film Editing, Oscar-Nominated | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.